Jesus
described himself as a 'ransom' (Matthew 20:28) and
the following statement summarises the the fairy story which J.W.'s
are sold as "truth" -
w96 11/1 p. 9
par. 12 - “As the benefits of Jesus’ ransom sacrifice are
progressively applied, the obedient subjects of
God’s Kingdom will grow to perfection, becoming
totally free from all the bad
effects of Adam’s sin.”
The
“faithful slave” also states this - w85 1/15 p. 16 par.
5 - "The price had to be the equivalent of
what was lost."
Picture this:
The 55 year old wife of
a JW is kidnapped. He later receives a call telling him that unless
he pays a ransom of $1,000,000, he will never see her again. He pays
the ransom – and waits.
Next day there's a
knock on door. The kidnappers have sent the man back – not his 55
year old wife – but a beautiful 25 year old girl with an exquisite
figure.
Did the man's ransom
buy back what was lost?
Accepting the J.W.
version of Jesus' ransom poses two serious problems:
1) What Jesus “bought back” was not equivalent
to what was lost, because he gained more than
what was lost – 144,000 humans will become immortal king/priests in heaven.
None of Adam's descendants were ever going to achieve
such a powerful, heavenly status.
2) Adam was immediately
physically perfect in Eden. If J.W.'s are going to have to “grow to
perfection” in order to “become totally free from
all the bad effects of Adam’s sin,” then Christ's sacrifice
wasn't payment enough to immediately
buy back what was lost – it's going to take 1000 years to do so - according to the org.